The court, upon reconsideration of Attachment Application No. 803 of 2017, granted the prayer for an attachment order as the respondents failed to furnish the security directed by the earlier order dated 25.04.2017.
Order of attachment to be transmitted through the District Court, Ahmedabad.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Application No.803 of 2017
Dr.ANITA SUMANTH J.
This Court, upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, vide order dated 25.04.2017 directed the respondents to furnish security to the extent of the claim made in the application on or before 05.06.2017, failing which, attachment order would be passed.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that no security has been furnished as directed by this Court. Notice issued to the 2nd respondent on 26.4.2017 has been returned with the endorsement refused. He would further submit that award of arbitration between the applicant and the respondents, has been passed as early as on 4.7.2016 and the same has attained finality.
3.The respondents are unrepresented though their names have been printed in the cause list. Therefore, there shall be an order of attachment as prayed for to be transmitted through the District Court, Ahamedabad, Gujarat.
07.06.2017
2
msr
Dr.ANITA SUMANTH J.
msr
Application No.803 of 2017
07.06.2017
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order of attachment should be passed in favour of the applicant due to non-furnishment of security by respondents.
Applicant
Respondents
Dr. Anita Sumanth J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
