R.Durai v. S.Amutha
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2016 and A .5823 of 2011 in C.S.No.674 of…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
A.6378 of 2016 and A.5823 of 2011 in C.S.No.674 of 2011
N.Sathish Kumar, J.,
This application is filed only to permit the applicants/defendants
to mark the document viz the DEED/memorandum of family arrangement dated 20.03.1995.
- The learned counsel for the applicants submit that they
prepared the memorandum during 1994 and the same was recorded as family arrangement on 20.03.1995.
3. The learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs opposed for
marking the document, on the ground that the said documents are not relied on by them in the suit documents annexed thereto and made serious objection on marking the aforesaid document. T he respondents can raise their objections with regard to marking of documents, the documents can be received subject to proof and relevancy and the same shall be decided
at the time of final disposal. Hence this application is allowed.
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Applicants/Defendants
- respondent
Respondents/Plaintiffs
Coram
N.Sathish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court