The applicant requested to strike a 3rd defendant's name from the list in C.S.No.453 of 2011. The application was dismissed as non-prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear for arguments.
Application dismissed as non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Appln No.6255 of 2013 in C.S.No.453 of 2011
N.Sathish Kumar, J.,
This application is pending from
The applicant is not ready for the arguments, which shows that he is not interested to prosecute the prosecution. Hence, the application is dismissed as non prosecution.
10.01.2017
KP
Unknown Applicant
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
