Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

D.Venkatraman Vs Mrs.D.G.Premalatha — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2017)

Home
Madras HC
2017
D.Venkatraman Vs Mrs.D.G.PremalathaD.Venkatraman v. Mrs.D.G.Premalatha

Allowed

D.Venkatraman v. Mrs.D.G.Premalatha

Madras HC9 Jan 2017A/102/2017

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (ORDINARY…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

A. No.102 of 2017

in

T.O.S No.20 of 2015

In the matter of the Indian

Succession Act XXXIX of 1925

And

In the matter of the law Will and TESTAMENT of D.Govardhana Ram Naidu (deceased)

1.D.Venkatraman (deceased)

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
1.D.Venkatraman (deceased) & others
respondent
Mrs.D.G.Premalatha & others

Coram

AI extract

N. Sathish Kumar

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 9 Jan 2017 · January
Registered: 6 Jan 2017
Case no.: A/102/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from N. Sathish Kumar

Sangeetha Mobiles Private Ltd. Vs M/S.Xpress Wave and Another
6 Jan 2017
D. Satish Babu Vs Ms. R. Vasantha
5 Jan 2017
E.K.Rajan Vs v.Natarajan and another
5 Jan 2017
W.S.Seetharam Vs T.R.T.Thirumalvasi & Another
9 Jan 2017

Cite this judgement

D.Venkatraman v. Mrs.D.G.Premalatha, A/102/2017 (MAD), decided on 9 January 2017.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

N. Sathish Kumar

Parties & counsel

Allowed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

s/o D.Govardhana Ram Naidu,

No.17, 1st Cross Street, Trustpuram, Kodambakkam,

Chennai 600 024

2.Janakiram D.V

No.17, 1st Cross Street, Trustpuram, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024

3.Sathyanarayana Ram D.V

No.17, 1st Cross Street, Trustpuram, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024

4.(*)Mrs.S.Vijayalakshmi

W/o Srinivasan,

62/45, Ragavan Street,

Choolai, Chennai 600 112

(*) Mrs.S.Vijayalakshmi, 4th plaintiff brought on record LR of the deceased 1st plaintiff as per Order dated 15/11/2016 in A.

2

No.3287/2016.

..Applicant/Petitioner

Vs.

1.Mrs.D.G.Premalatha @ C.N.Rajalakshmi W/o Late C.V..Neelalochana 2B, Booblie Raja Street, Kalinga Colony, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 600 078

2.Mrs.C.V.Gangabai, W/o C.V.Sanjeevi, 1598, 5th Cross Street, XVth Main Road, J Block,

Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040

3.Mrs.M.Lillykumari, w/o K.V.Madhavan, 17, Sundaram Pillai Street, Purasawalkam, Chennai 600 007

..Respondents/Defendants

A. No.102 of 2017

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to receive the following documents filed by the applicants/plaintiffs

(i) A original copy of the police complaint dated 26.09.1990 preferred by late Govardhana Ram Naidu (deceased) (ii) the Original Extract of CSR (Community Service Register) issued by R.2 Police Station, Kodambakkam, Chennai-24.

This Application coming on this day before this court for hearing the court made the following order:

This application is filed by the applicant/plaintiff to receive the

additional documents which is mentioned in the list of documents

annexed with the Judges summons.

3

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the

learned counsel for the respondent.

Considering the submissions made on either side and

considering the fact that no objection raised on the side of

respondent and also going through the averments made in the

affidavit, I am inclined to allow the application, but, however the

documents sought to be received as additional evidence can be marked subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility at the time of evidence.

Therefore, the applicant/plaintiff is permitted to file the

additional documents, subject to proof and relevancy can be decided

by this Court of those documents at the time of final disposal.

With the above observations, the application is allowed.

//Certified to be true copy//

Dated at Madras this the th day of 2018.

TPY/1.6.2018

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

CNR

HCMA010019362017

Topic

Succession and Inheritance

Bench

N. Sathish Kumar

Disposal

ALLOWED

P.Senkeni and 2 Others Vs P.Subramani and Another

9 Jan 2017

H.Shankar Vs C.S.Deva Kumar

9 Jan 2017