V.Sundararaj v. Mr.C.T.Rajendran
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order condoning delay in filing written statement and recording it.
What did the court decide?
Condoned delay of 589 days and taken written statement on record.
What the court decided
1
A. N o . 53 1 8 of 20 1 7
IN
C . S . N o . 80 of 20 1 5
C . V . K A R T H I K E Y A N , J.
This application has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 589 days in
filing the written statement.
2. The reason given in the affidavit to condone the delay is that the suit
had been filed for specific performance. It has been stated that the plaintiff had
misused the documents executed in blank. It had been stated that during the year 2015, the office was damaged because of rain. Thereafter, there was a delay in
filing the written statement.
3 . In view of the fact that pleadings are necessary for determining the
Coram
C. V. KARThikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court