The applicant sought security from the respondent wife for the suit claim. The court dismissed the application, holding the suit to be vexatious and refusing to enter the controversy between a husband and wife regarding marital status.
The application praying for security furnishing and attachment of properties was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
A.No.3536 of 2017 in C.S. No.520 of 2017
S.Thirupala Reddy, S/o.Late Sidda Reddy, Door No.116, New No.47, Varadha Muthiappan street, Chennai-600 001. ...Applicant/Plaintiff VS
1.Mrs.chandrakala, D/o.Late Venkata Reddy, No.49, Pedariyar Koil Street, Mannadi, Chennai-600 001.
2.M/s.Varalakshmi Rice co. Rept. By Mrs.S.Chandrakala, Old No.31, New No.61, Acharappan Street, Chennai-600 079. ...Respondents/Defendants
A.No.3536 of 2017:-
Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the First Respondent/Defendant to furnish security for the suit claim of Rs.28,44,999/- and in the absence of the same attach the properties more fully derscribed in the schedule to the Judges Summons before passing Judgment and the same may be attached through District Munsif Court, Nellore.
This application coming on this day before this
court for hearing the court made the following order:
2
This application has been filed by the
applicant/plaintiff, to direct the 1st respondent/defendant to furnish the security for the suit claim of Rs.28,44,999/and in absence of the same, attach the properties described in the schedule to the judges summons in C.S. No. 520 of 2017, before passing the Judgment and the same may be attached through the learned District Munsif Court, Nellore.
05.09.2017
//Certified to be a true copy//
Dated this the day of 2017.
EM/08.09.2017 COURT OFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to direct the respondent wife to furnish security for the suit claim.
S. Thirupala Reddy
Mrs. Chandrakala
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
