The Single Judge allowed an application filed by the defendant to file additional documents prior to the suit, relying on the precedent of Bipin Shantilal Pachal, subject to admissibility, relevancy, and proof.
Application allowed; documents to be taken on file subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A. No.1815 of 2017 in
C.S. No.125 of 2013
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J,
Application No.1815 of 2017 has been filed by the defendant in the suit, seeking to file additional documents, as set out in Judges summons to the application prior to the suit.
(2/2)
ksa
1 issue framed by the court
Whether additional documents filed prior to the suit can be taken on file subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bipin Shantilal Pachal -Vs- State of Gujarat and anotherFollowed¶5
2001(3) SCC 1, Bipin Shantilal Pachal -Vs- State of Gujarat and another · Who else cites this
Defendant in the suit
Unknown Opposing Party
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
