The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashal of an order and a direction to grant an educational loan. The court did so because the respondent stated the petitioner was reported dead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.02.2016 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD)No.915 of 2014
A.Padmanabhan
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Senior Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, 102 M 5, Syed Complex, Tirunelveli Junction. ... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and further directing the respondent to grant educational loan to the petitioner's son for the course of B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) as per bonafide certificate issued by his college.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvan For Respondent : Mr.M.Senthil Kumar
O R D E R
The Writ Petition has been filed for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently, directing the respondent to grant educational loan to the petitioner's son for the course of B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) as per bonafide certificate issued by his college.
Sd/
Assistant Registrar
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
The Senior Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, 102 M 5, Syed Complex, Tirunelveli Junction.
+1cc to Mr.M.Senthil Kumar, Advocate SR.No.10599 CN/JGB-DP/10.03.2016/2P-3C
W.P.(MD)No.915 of 2014 23.02.2016
A.Padmanabhan
The Senior Manager, Indian Overseas Bank
B.RAJENDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
