Dismissed

J. Blake Solomon Chandra v. the Joint Director

Madras HC7 Sept 2016WP(MD)/4710/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court heard writ petitions filed by a headmaster against various educational officers and the school management. The court recorded a letter dated 01.09.2016 seeking withdrawal of the petitions and dismissed them as withdrawn, dismissing connected miscellaneous petitions as well.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the petitions as withdrawn along with connected miscellaneous petitions without costs.

J. Blake Solomon Chandra Vs the Joint Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 07.09.2016

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)Nos.4710, 7440 and 15967 of 2013 and M.P(MD)Nos.1, 1, 1, 2 and 2 of 2013

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.4710 of 2013

¶8

J.Blake Solomon Chandra Sekaran Headmaster

¶9

Sengunthar Higher Secondary School, Turaiyur – 621010, Trichy District.

¶10

... Petitioner Vs.

¶11

1.The Joint Director, Higher Secondary Education, Directorate of School Education,

¶12

Chennai – 6.

¶13

2.The Chief Educational Officer,

¶14

Trichy – 620008.

¶15

3.The District Educational Officer, Musiri – 621 211.

¶16

4.The Secretary, Sengunthar Higher Secondary School, Turaiyur – 621010.

¶17

5.Mr.C.Perumal Secretary, Sengunthar Higher Secondary School, Turaiyur – 621010,

¶18

Trichy District.

¶19

... Respondents

¶20

Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned charge memo issued by the 4^th /5^th respondent in his proceedings No. Nil dated 08.03.2013 and quash https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the same as illegal.

¶21

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ajmalkhan Senior Counsel for M/s Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.Aairam K.Selvakumar Govt. Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.V.Singan for R4 and R5

¶23

W.P.(MD)No.7440 of 2013

¶24

J.Blake Solomon Chandra Sekaran Headmaster Sengunthar Higher Secondary School, Turaiyur – 621010, Trichy District.

¶25

... Petitioner

¶26

1.The Joint Director, Higher Secondary Education, Directorate of School Education, Chennai – 6. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Trichy – 620008, Trichy District. 3.The District Educational Officer, Musiri – 621 211, Trichy District. 4.Former Secretary, Sengunthar Higher Secondary School, Turaiyur – 621010, Trichy District.

¶27

... Respondents

¶28

Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3^rd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.1600/B3/2013, dated 25.04.2013, and quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the 3^rd respondent to release the staff grant for the month of April, 2013 and to succeeding months for disbursement of salary through the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Headmaster within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶29

¶30

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ajmalkhan Senior Counsel for M/s Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.Aairam K.Selvakumar Govt. Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.V.Singan for R4

¶31

W.P.(MD)No.15967 of 2013

¶32

J.Blake Solomon Chandra Sekaran Headmaster Sengunthar Higher Secondary School, Turaiyur – 621010, Trichy District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Joint Director, Higher Secondary Education, Directorate of School Education, Chennai – 6. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Trichy – 620008, Trichy District. 3.The District Educational Officer, Musiri – 621 211, Trichy District. 4.Sengunthar Higher Secondary School, rep. by its Secretary Turaiyur – 621010, Trichy District. (R4 impleaded vide Court order dt.4/4/13 in MP.3/13) 5.Sengunthar Higher Secondary School, Turaiyur – 621010, Trichy District. (R5 impleaded as Court, vide order dt.17.01.2014 in MP.4 of 2014 ... Respondents

¶33

Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3^rd respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.4725/Aa3/2013, dated 20.09.2013, and quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the 3^rd respondent to give permission for continuation of the petitioner

¶34

¶35

service till the end of this academic year i.e. from 01.10.2013 to 31.05.2014 and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to forward the pension proposal dated 26.07.2013 to the Accountant General with the period that may by stipulated by this Court.

¶36

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ajmalkhan Senior Counsel for M/s Ajmal Associates

¶37

For Respondents : Mr.Aairam K.Selvakumar Govt. Advocate

¶38

for R1 to R3

¶39

Mr.R.Subramanian for R4

¶40

Mr.M.E.Elango for R5

¶41

COMMON ORDER

¶42

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 01.09.2016 to the Registry seeking withdrawal of these writ petitions.

¶43

Recording the same, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

¶44

Sd/-

¶45

Assistant Registrar(Writs)

¶46

/True copy/

¶47

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶48

¶49

1.The Joint Director,

¶50

Higher Secondary Education,

¶51

Directorate of School Education,

¶52

Chennai – 6.

¶53

2.The Chief Educational Officer,

¶54

Trichy – 620008.

¶55

3.The District Educational Officer,

¶56

Musiri – 621 211.

¶57

+3cc to M/s.Ajmal Associates, SR.No.50077 to 50079

¶58

+1cc to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate SR.No.50869 skn

¶59

sm:SKS-RR:22.9.2016:4P/8C

¶60

W.P.(MD)Nos.4710, 7440 and 15967 of 2013

¶61

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶62

and M.P(MD)Nos.1, 1, 1, 2 and 2 of 2013 07.09.2016

J. Blake Solomon Chandra v. the Joint Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J. Blake Solomon Chandra v. the Joint Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Kaleeswaran Vs R.Samundeeswaran

T.K. Arumugam (Deceased) Vs Smt.Sivagamasundari

Mrs.Manimegalai, Vs Smt.Soroja

S.Pandi Vs the Secretary to Govt.

Rev. C.H. Alfred, Corporate Vs the Director of School

Sundarajan Vs Dr.K.Chandrasekaran