Disposed

T.K. Arumugam (Deceased) v. Smt.Sivagamasundari

Madras HC2 Sept 2016CRP/15/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a decree in a mutation suit. The Court directed the lower court to admit a previous Advocate Commissioner's report into evidence for a pending suit within three months before closing the revision.

What did the court decide?

The Advocate Commissioner's report dated 16.07.2009 was directed to be marked as Court document in O.S.No.170 of 2008; the suit was to be disposed of within three months; the Civil Revision Petition w

T.K. Arumugam (Deceased) Vs Smt.Sivagamasundari — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.09.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶6

C.R.P.(PD)No.15 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 and CMP.No.1803 of 2016

¶7

1.T.K.Arumugam (Deceased)

¶8

2.Durga Arumugam

¶9

.. Petitioner

¶10

(2^nd Petitioner brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole petitioner vide order of this Court dated 12.08.2016 made in CMP.No.4234 to 4236 of 2016 in CRP(PD)No.15 of 2014)

Sivagamasundari

.. Respondent

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decreetal order made in I.A.No.787 of 2012 in O.S.No.170 of 2010 dated 12.11.2013, on the file of District Munsif Court at Udhagamandalam.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Premkumar

¶16

For Respondent : Mr.N.Sampath

¶17

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This petition is filed praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order, dated 12.11.2013 made in I.A.No.787 of 2012 in O.S.No.170 of 2010 on the file of District Munsif Court, Udhagamandalam.

¶20

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner represented that already a suit has been filed in O.S.No.170 of 2008, on the file of District Munsif Court, Udhagamandalam, in which an application in I.A.No.787 of 2012 was filed by the defendant/respondent for appointment of Advocate Commissioner. After hearing both sides, the application was dismissed by the learned Trial Judge.

¶21

3.Pursuant to the above order, the Advocate Commissioner has also filed his report dated 16.07.2009 before the trial Court. The petitioner/plaintiff also filed a suit in O.S.No.170 of 2010 in I.A.No.787 of 2012 in seeking for appointment of Advocate Commissioner and the same was dismissed on 12.11.2013. Against which, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

¶22

4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the

¶23

¶24

materials available on record.

¶25

5.Though earlier Advocate Commissioner's report was filed on 16.07.2009 and marked as Ex.C1 in O.S.No.190 of 2008 and this respondent has no serious objection, but his only request is that the said document may be marked in the present suit in O.S.No.170 of 2010.

¶26

6.Therefore, recording the above submission, the Advocate Commissioner's report dated 16.07.2009 is directed to be marked as Court document in O.S.No.170 of 2008. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.170 of 2008, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In this regard, both parties are directed to co-operate for early disposal of the suit.

¶27

7.Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No

¶28

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶29

02.09.2016

¶30

¶31

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

¶32

¶33

M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,

¶34

¶35

¶36

The District Munsif Court, Udhagamandalam.

¶37

C.R.P.(PD)No.15 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 and CMP.No.1803 of 2016

¶38

02.09.2016

T.K. Arumugam (Deceased) v. Smt.Sivagamasundari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.K. Arumugam (Deceased) v. Smt.Sivagamasundari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayakani (Died) Vs M. Sivasami

M.Nagarajan Vs P.S.S.Manoharan

Thirumoorty @ Moorthy Vs Amsaveni

P.Thangamuthu Vs S.D.Sengottuvel

P.Shanmughasundram Vs N. Shanmugham

R.Kaleeswaran Vs R.Samundeeswaran