Allowed

Nallasiriar Arima Nammalvar v. the Director of Matriculation

Madras HC18 Nov 2016WP(MD)/22130/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the Director of Matriculation to consider the petitioner school's revised proposal for VIII to X standards within two weeks. The order suspended an interim directive to deploy students to another school pending the decision.

What did the court decide?

The third respondent (Inspector of Matriculation) directed to consider the revised proposal within two weeks; interim order of deployment suspended.

Nallasiriar Arima Nammalvar Vs the Director of… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18.11.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Writ Petition(MD)No.22130 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.15847 of 2016

¶5

Nallasiriar Arima Nammalvar Soliammal Matriculation School, Rep. By its Correspondent, Mr.N.Nammalvar, Thirumangalam, Madurai District. ..Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Matriculation, O/o.the Directorate of Matriculation, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai -6.

¶6

2.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o.the Chief Educational Office, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶7

3.Inspector of Matriculation Schools, O/o.the Inspector of Matriculation School Office, Thallakulam, Madurai District. ..Respondents

¶8

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3^rd respondent to consider the revised proposal, dated 06.05.2016 submitted by the petitioner's School, within a stipulated time.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ajmalkhan, Senior Counsel for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandharaj, Government Advocate

¶10

ORDER

¶11

Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

¶12

By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶13

According to the petitioner, they are running a High https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ School and already they got approval upto VII standard. Now, for approval of VIII to X Standard, they sent proposal for recognition but the same was rejected on the ground of certain deficiencies.

¶14

¶15

The learned senior counsel for the petitioner would submit that they have rectified the deficiencies and re-submitted the proposal on 06.05.2016. But, till date no order has been passed by the third respondent. He would further submit that the petitioner-school already admitted four students in all three classes and now the Authorities passed an order directing them to deploy the students to some other school. Hence, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that till the orders passed by the third respondent, the order of deployment should be kept in abeyance.

¶16

Considering the fact that the petitioner's revised proposal is pending with the third respondent from 06.05.2016, the third respondent is directed to consider the said proposal and pass orders on the same, within a period of two weeks from today, till such time, the order of deployment should be kept in abeyance.

¶17

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶20

/True copy/

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

¶23

1.The Director of Matriculation, O/o.the Directorate of Matriculation,

¶24

College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai -6.

¶25

2.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o.the Chief Educational Office, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶26

3.Inspector of Matriculation Schools, O.o.the Inspector of Matriculation School Office, Thallakulam, Madurai District.

¶27

+1cc to Mr.Ajmal Associates, in SR.70480

¶28

W.P(MD)No.22130 of 2016 18.11.2016

¶29

¶30

PBK/SKN/SAR-III 18.11.2016 ::2P-5C:(IT)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Nallasiriar Arima Nammalvar v. the Director of Matriculation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nallasiriar Arima Nammalvar v. the Director of Matriculation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Raju, S/O.Palani Vs the Tahsildar

K.Kanisekar, Vs the Special Commissioner

N. Muthukrishnan (Ex.Army) Vs the Director Genral of Police

Felix Antoni Nicholas Vs Anna University

Pandi Selvam, S/O.Sakkarai Vs the Regional Passport Officer

M.L.Sujin Vs the Registrar