Writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of rejection to conduct a Kabadi tournament was dismissed as the matter sought in the petition had become infructuous.
None granted; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.12.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU
W.P(MD)No.216 of 2015
G. Thangamariyappan .. Petitioner
vs.
For Petitioner : Mr. R. Alagumani
For Respondents : Mr. A. Muthukaruppan, Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The petitioner challenges the order dated 01.01.2015 issued by the third respondent rejecting the request of the petitioner to conduct Kabadi Tournament on 17.01.2015 and 18.01.2015.
2
Sd/-
Deputy Registrar (Admin)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To,
+1 cc to MR.R.ALAGUMANI, Advocate SR.No.80179
+1 cc to Special Government Pleader SR.No.79797
W.P(MD)No.216 of 2015 05.12.2016
SMA/PM/29.12.2016:2P/6C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Thangamariyappan
Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajapalayam
Inspector of Police, Seithur Rural Police Station
K. Ravichandra Babu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
