Samayapathi v. Kannayan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed against a junior court decree. The appellant was absent when listed. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Appelant dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 02.12.2016
Coram
The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Second Appeal No.83 of 2016
Samayapathi .... Appellant/2nd Defandant
Vs.
- Kannayan 2. Murugesa Padayachi 2. Vimala .... Respondents/Plaintiff 1st Defandant & 3rd Respondent
Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 22.07.2011 passed in A.S.No.58 of 2010 on the file of Additional Sub-Court, Virudhachalam, reversing the judgment and decree dated 21.07.2010 made in O.S.No.492/2008 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Vriudhachalam.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.V.Raghavachari for R1 Ms.J.Starli for R2 and R3 J U D G M E N T
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC in the absence of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Samayapathi
- respondent
Kannayan
- respondent
Murugesa Padayachi
- respondent
Vimala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court