The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the first respondent to dispose of the petitioners' representation regarding promotion as Anganwadi Workers on merits, following a personal hearing, within two months.
Direction to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 27.01.2011 on merits after hearing within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.11.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
W.P.(MD)Nos.1801 to 1803 of 2011
and
M.P(MD)Nos.1, 1 and 1 of 2011
U.Sethulakshmi ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.1801 of 2011 A.Muthulakshmi ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.1802 of 2011 K.Hemalatha ... Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.1803 of 2011
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2.The Child Development Project Officer, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents
Prayer in all petitions: Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to promote the respective petitioners to the post of Anganwadi Worker in any of the Anganwadi Centres situated in Arupukottai, Virudhunager District, on the basis of the petitioners' representation dated 27.01.2011 respectively within the stipulated period which this Court may deem fit and proper.
For Petitioner in all Wps : Mr.G.Marimuthu For Respondents : Mr.Aairam K.Selvakumar in all Wps Govt. Advocate
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions have been filed by the respective petitioner for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to promote these petitioners to the post of Anganwadi Worker in any of the Anganwadi Centres situated in Arupukottai, Virudhunager District, on the basis of their https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ representation, dated 27.01.2011 respectively.
2
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
With the above direction, these Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CO)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2.The Child Development Project Officer, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar District.
+1 CC to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR No.70251
+1 CC to Mr.G.MARIMUTHU, Advocate, SR No.70090 TO 70092
W.P.(MD)Nos.1801 to 1803 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1, 1 and 1 of 2011 17.11.2016
skn SH/SKS-RR:30.11.2016:2P/7C
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the District Collector should promote the petitioners to the post of Anganwadi Worker based on their representations.
Whether the respondents must dispose of the representations on merits within a stipulated time after a personal hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
U. Sethulakshmi
A. Muthulakshmi
K. Hemalatha
The District Collector, Virudhunagar District
The Child Development Project Officer, Arupukottai
M.V. Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
