Disposed

G. NEHRU/2176912 v. the General Manager

Madras HC15 Nov 2016WP(MD)/1302/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction for notional promotion for a security subordinate inspector. The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.11.2010 and pass appropriate orders after affording a personal hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.11.2010 and pass orders after affording a personal hearing within eight weeks.

G. NEHRU/2176912 Vs the General Manager — Property and Title | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 15.11.2016

¶3

Coram

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Writ Petition (MD)No.1302 of 2011

¶5

and

¶6

M.P.(MD) No. 1 of 2011

¶7

G. NEHRU/2176912 SUB INSPECTOR GRADE-I, SECURITY,

¶8

BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED, TRICHY-14.

¶9

. . . Petitioner

¶10

-Vs-

¶11

1 THE GENERAL MANAGER,

¶12

HUMAN RESOURCE BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICAL LIMITED,

¶13

TRICHY-14.

¶14

2 THE DEPUTY CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER,

¶15

BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICAL LIMITED, TRICHY-14. . . . Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to give notional promotion Sub Inspector Grade1 /Security with effect from the date on par with his collegues and juniors were promoted i.e. from 2004 on wards taking in account of the modification of the punishment made in the order of appeal dated 19/02/2007 and to pass any order which is deem to fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice.(prayer amended vide order dt.09/04/2012 in MP.2/2011).

¶17

For petitioner :Mr. B. Janath Ahmed

¶18

For respondents :Mr. A.V.Arun for R-1 and R-2

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction, directing the respondents herein to give notional promotion Sub Inspector Grade-1 /Security with effect from the date on par with his collegues and juniors were promoted i.e. from 2004 on wards taking in account of the modification of the punishment made in the order of appeal dated 19/02/2007.

¶21

2.Heard the submissions made on either side and perused the records carefully.

¶22

3.The case of the petitioner is that on account of a charge-memo issued against him on 01.09.2003, he is deprived of his service benefits. In this regard, he has submitted several https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ representations from the year 2006 to the respondents. But, sofar, they have not been considered. Hence, he has approached this Court.

¶23

¶24

4.In view of the above, the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.11.2010 and pass orders on the same in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also disposed of.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶28

/True copy/

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

¶31

1 THE GENERAL MANAGER, HUMAN RESOURCE BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICAL LTD. TRICHY-14. 2 THE DEPUTY CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER, BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICAL LTD. TRICHY-14.

¶32

¶33

ms skn mm 27 07 2017 2p 3c

¶34

W.P.(md).No.1302 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No. 1 of 2011 15.11.2016

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G. NEHRU/2176912 v. the General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. NEHRU/2176912 v. the General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Muruganantham, Vs the Director of Medical

T.S. Ramachandra Marthandan, Vs the District Revenue Officer

Manju P.Bhattathiri, Vs the Government of Tami Nadu

M.Amul Mary Vs the Principal Accountant

Tirunelveli C.M.S. Evangelical Vs the District Registrar

B. Nagaraj Vs Green Earth