Dismissed

S.Martin Joseph, v. the District Collector

Madras HC7 Nov 2016WP(MD)/11807/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging garbage dumping sites and a sewage treatment plant plan. The court held that these issues fall under the National Green Tribunal's jurisdiction as similar matters were already pending there. The petitioners were granted liberty to approach the NGT.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed with liberty to approach the National Green Tribunal.

S.Martin Joseph, Vs the District Collector — Environment and Pollution | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 07.11.2016

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶6

W.P.[MD].Nos.11807 of 2013 and 21587 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013 in W.P.(MD).No.11807/2013 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015 in W.P.(MD).No.21587/2015

¶7

W.P.(MD).No.11807 of 2013:

¶8

S.Martin Joseph .. Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The District Collector, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶11

2.The Commissioner,

¶12

Karaikudi Municipality, Karaikudi.

¶13

3.The Commissioner, Devakottai Municipality, Devakottai.

¶14

4.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi. .. Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to shift the dumping for garbage and solid waste that emanates from Karaikudi Town and other areas into the land situated Ward No.17, Block No.11, T.S.No.468 Rayathu Manai, Measuring 12 acres and 93 cents and Ward No.17, block No.11, T.S.No.469/1, Rayathu Manai, measuring 1 Acre and 43 cents both at Karaikudi Town, near Devakottai Rastha Village to any other appropriate site which does not affect the public health and safety.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.AL.Kannan

¶17

For respondents 1 & 4 : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar,

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Government Advocate

¶20

¶21

For 2^nd respondent : Ms.K.Elil Selvi For 3^rd respondent : No appearance

¶22

W.P.(MD).No.21587 of 2015:

¶23

Rastha Resident's Rights and Welfare Association, rep. by its President, Martin Joseph, S/o.Sebastin, No.30, Vasandhan Nagar, Rastha, Karaikudi-630 005.

¶24

.. Petitioner

¶25

Vs.

¶26

The Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality, Karaikudi. .. Respondent

¶27

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to shift the existing plan of STP (Sewage Treatment Plant) project from Town Survey Nos.545/2, 552/8, 552/9 and 561 Ward 16 and Block No.16 of Karaikudi Revenue Village and Taluk, Sivagangai District to any other appropriate place which does not affect the public health and safety.

¶28

For Petitioner : Mr.R.M.Arun Swaminathan

¶29

For respondent : Ms.K.Elil Selvi

¶30

COMMON ORDER

¶31

[ Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.]

¶32

The issues involved in these writ petitions are to be examined by the National Green Tribunal. It is reported that similar matters are already pending before the National Green Tribunal. In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy before the National Green Tribunal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

¶33

Sd/-

¶34

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶35

/True Copy/

¶36

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

gcg

1.The District Collector, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality, Karaikudi. 3.The Commissioner, Devakottai Municipality, Devakottai. 4.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi. +1cc to M/s H.Mohammed Imran Advocate Sr.No. 67142 +1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No. 66629 JAM/18.11.16/CK/3p-7c

¶42

Order made in W.P.[MD].Nos.11807 of 2013 and 21587 of 2015 07.11.2016

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Martin Joseph, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Martin Joseph, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palani Vs the Inspector of Police

Mahamani Vs the Inspector of Police

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police

Ammasi Vs the Inspector of Police

Sooramuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police