Ramsankar v. State Thro the
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged orders permitting non-bidders to commence TV services. Court found no illegality; petition was closed without orders as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; no order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.11.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Writ Petition (MD) No.11676 2015 and M.P. (MD).No.1 of 2015
Ramsankar ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The State through the Chief Secretary to the Government of Tamil nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.
- The Managing Director, Arasu Cable TV Corporation, Dugar Towers 6th Floor, No.34, Marshalls Road,
Egmore, Chennai-08.
3.The Special Tahsildar, Cable TV, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 4.R.Geethalakshmi 5.S.Arunpandi ... Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramsankar
- respondent
The State through the Chief Secretary to the Government of Tamil nadu
- respondent
The Managing Director, Arasu Cable TV Corporation
- respondent
The Special Tahsildar, Cable TV, Usilampatti
- respondent
R.Geethalakshmi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court