Allowed

Sundaram Hydraulics Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC11 Jan 2016WP/977/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by Nachammal under Article 226 for issuance of mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of her application for patta grant for land bearing Survey No.321/1.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to consider the petitioner application dated 26.10.2016, pass appropriate orders after giving sufficient opportunity within three months of receipt of copy of this order.

Sundaram Hydraulics Limited Vs The Assistant… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶3

Dated: 23.01.2017

¶4

Coram

¶5

The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶6

W.P.No.977 of 2016

1 Nachammal

[ PETITIONER ]

The Thasildhar South, Thiruppur District, Kolavanchepalayam, Veerapandi Post, Thiruppur.

¶11

[ RESPONDENTS ]

¶12

Prayer:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to dispose the petitioner application dated 26.10.2016 thereafter the respondent directed to the petitioner to file an application through online, therefore, the said application was further filed through online in 2016/0103/32/052931 dated 21.12.2016 and transfer the patta in the name of the petitioner from the name of Boothan Board for the land bearing Survey No.321/1 to an extent of 6 acres situated at Veerapandi Village, Palladam Taluk.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Venkatachalapathy Senior Counsel for Mr.E.Sampathkumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajeswaran Special Government Pleader

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The petitioner has filed this writ petition to dispose the petitioner's application dated 26.10.2016.

¶16

¶17

B.RAJENDRAN,J. vri

¶18

2.According to the petitioner, he made an application dated

¶19

26.10.2016 to the respondent for grant of patta. He also filed application through online on 21.12.2016. Since there was no response from the respondent, the present writ petition is filed.

¶20

3.Heard both sides.

¶21

4.In view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, this court without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, directs the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 26.10.2016 and to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶22

23.01.2017

¶23

vri To The Thasildhar South, Thiruppur District, Kolavanchepalayam, Veerapandi Post, Thiruppur.

¶24

¶25

http://www.judis.nic.in

Sundaram Hydraulics Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundaram Hydraulics Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.S.Geetha Bai Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Mahendra College of Engineerin Vs The Government of India

M/s.Pon Pure Chemical India Vs The Commissioner of Customs

V.Anniyappan Vs The Transport Commissioner

M.R.Palanisamy Vs State of Tamil Nadu

K.Kumar, Vs The State Transport