No summary available as the order dismisses the withdrawn petition without ruling on the substantive legal arguments regarding bus passenger restrictions.
Withdrawal of the Writ Petition allowed with liberty to file a new Writ Petition subject to the outcome of relevant Special Leave Petitions pending before the Supreme Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.Mahadevan
Writ Petition No.35435 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 and WMP.No.402 of 2016
Mahendra College of Engineering, Attur Main Road, Minnampalli, Salem - 636 106. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Government of India, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Road Transport and Highways, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.
... Respondents Prayer:-
Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the benefit of paragraph 6 (c) of the Notification of the first respondent in S.O. 70 (E) dated 13.01.2012, is available to all the educational institution buses more specifically mentioned in the schedule hereunder as defined in Section 2 (11) of the Motor Vehicles Act and not only for school buses.
For Petitioner : Mr.Muthumani Doraisami For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.K.Raju, Central Govt. Standing Counsel For Respondent-3 : Mr.P.Wilson Associates For Respondent-4 : Mrs.R.Maheswari
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the Writ Petition, and he also made the following endorsement :-
"He may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file new Writ Petition subject to the outcome of the Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.13614, 13615, 14097 and 14098 of 2014, pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court." 2. In view of the said submission, coupled with the endorsement, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty, as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected M.Ps are closed. sd/Assistant Registrar(Cs-IV) /TRUE COPY/ Sub-Assistant Registrar sd To 1. The Government of India, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Road Transport and Highways, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi. 3. National Highways Authority of India, rep. by its Chairman, G 5 & 6 Section 10, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110 075. 3. The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Narasothipatti, Salem - 636 004.
WP.No.35435/2015
CO-CA
JD 22/01/2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra College of Engineering
The Government of India
National Highways Authority of India
The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India
SU Toll Road Private Limited
R.Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
