Dismissed

Subramaniam, v. the Chairman

Madras HC7 Dec 2016WP/994/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking issuance of Mandamus for allotment of house property. Petitioner withdrew the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh one; the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition; Connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

Subramaniam, Vs the Chairman — Property and Title | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.12.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶5

W.P.No.994 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013

¶6

Subramaniam .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai – 600 005. 2.The Estate Officer – I, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Ezhil Nagar Extension, Kodungaiyur, Chennai – 600 118. 3.The Principal Secretary to the State of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009 .. Respondents (R3 is impleaded as per order of this Court dated 24.11.2016 in WMP No.35273 of 2016 in W.P.No.994 of 2013)

¶7

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to accept the full payments meant for the allotment of a house property, bearing Plot No.45, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Ezhil Nagar Extension Scheme, Chennai – 600 118 and execute the Sale Deed in favour of the petitioner.

¶8

For petitioner : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.B.Kesavan Standing Counsel for TN Slum Clearance Board For 3^rd respondent : Mr.D.Suryanarayan, Government Advocate

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

ORDER

¶11

In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the leaned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition, due to subsequent event, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶12

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
asvm
To
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board,
No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
Chennai – 600 005.
2.The Estate Officer – I,
Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board,
Ezhil Nagar Extension, Kodungaiyur,
Chennai – 600 118.
3.The Principal Secretary
to the Government of Tamil Nadu,
Revenue Department, Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009.
W.P.No.994 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
UG(CO)
RVR 20/01/2017

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Subramaniam, v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subramaniam, v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.a.Naganathan, Vs State of Tamil Nadu

A.B.Elangovan Vs Chennai Metropolitan

P.Karthika Vs the Controller of

R. Sivaprakasam Vs the Commissioner

V.Saravanan Vs the Assistant Engineer

K.Saravanan, Vs the Union of India