This single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition for want of maintainability, directing the petitioner to challenge the specific rejection order dated 19.11.2016 instead.
The writ petition failed and is dismissed. Liberty granted to challenge the order dated 19.11.2016 if advised. Costs to respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.12.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P.No.43500 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.37328 of 2016
Kanaka [ Petitioner ] Vs
The Indian Oil Corporation Indian Oil Bhavan Rep by its Executive Director No.139 Mahatma Gandhi Road Chennai-600 034 [Respondents]
PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's application dated 20.11.2014 for retail outlet dealership in respect of the proposed outlet to be established at Kokkarayannpettai Namakkal District pursuant to the Respondent notification dated 16.10.2014.
For Petitioner : MrP.Chandrasekar For Respondent : Mr.M. Ravindran, Senior Counsel for Mr.V.Anandha Natarajan
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Ravindran, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.V.Anandha Natarajan, learned Standing Counsel who accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and with the consent on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.
they have done re-inspection of the site proposed by the petitioner. The petitioner states that it transpires that on the basis of the unilateral inspection, the authority has rejected the site offered by her, so that the dealership could be allotted to some other person. Aggrieved over the action of the respondent, the petitioner is before this Court.
Sub-Assistant Registrar
rg
To
Executive Director The Indian Oil Corporation Indian Oil Bhavan No.139 Mahatma Gandhi Road Chennai-600 034
+1 CC to Mr. P. Chandrasekar, Advocate in SR 74506
+1 CC to Mr. V. Anantha Natarajan, Advocate SR 73941
W.P.No.43500 of 2016
SS
sp/24/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding rejection of dealership application is maintainable or assertion of dismissal of the petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanaka
The Indian Oil Corporation
B. Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
