The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of a writ petition filed by A. Arulappan seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Tahsildar to issue patta in specific survey numbers, noting that the case had already been considered and orders passed. No substantive dispensation was granted apart from disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.12.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P.No.38882 of 2016
A.Arulappan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Thiruvannamalai District,
Thiruvannamalai.
2. The District Revenue Officer,
Thiruvannamalai District,
Thiruvannamalai.
3. The Tahsildar,
Polur Taluk,
Polur.
4. The Tahsildar,
Chetpet Taluk,
Chepet. ... Respondents
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent herein to issue patta in favour of the petitioner in Survey No.256/1 of Odhalavadi Village, Pathiyavaram, based on the order passed by the 3rd respondent vide his Proceedings No.Na.Ka.G2/10999/2001, dated 13.09.2001.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Elumalai For Respondents : Mr.R.S.Selvam, Government Advocate
O R D E R
The Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent herein to issue patta in favour of the petitioner in Survey No.256/1 of Odhalavadi Village, Pathiyavaram, based on the order passed by the 3rd respondent vide his Proceedings in No.Na.Ka.G2/10999/2001, dated 13.09.2001.
+1cc to Mr.N. Elumalai, Advocate, S.R.No.71981 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.72228
mv(CO)
md(22/12/2016)
W.P.No.38882 of 2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition seeking issuance of patta based on a 2001 order deserves judicial intervention.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Arulappan
The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District
The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvannamalai District
The Tahsildar, Polur Taluk
The Tahsildar, Chetpet Taluk
B. Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
