Dismissed

A.Nakkeeran v. The State Mines and Mineral

Madras HC28 Sept 2016WP/34199/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction for the disposal of a representation regarding sand quarry operations. The Court directed the District Collector to dispose of the representation within one month after notice to all concerned and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to dispose of the petitioner's representation within one month after notice to all concerned.

A.Nakkeeran Vs The State Mines and Mineral — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated: 28.09.2016

¶3

Coram:

¶4

The Honourable Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and The Honourable Mr.Justice R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.No.34199 of 2016

¶6

A.Nakkeeran ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State Mines and Mineral Development Department, Sand Quarry, Panaggal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015.

¶7

2.The District Collector, District Collector's Office, Villupuram District. 3.The Superintendent of Police Villupuram. 4.The Tahsildar, Thirukovilur Taluk, Villupuram District. 5.The Water Resource/Development Department, P.W.D, Thirukovilur Taluk, Villupuram.

¶8

6.The Village Administrative Officer, Arulavadi Panchayat, Thirukovilur Taluk, Villupuram District. ... Respondents

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.09.2016 within a time frame.

¶10

For Petitioner ::: Mr.K.Sudharkar For Respondents::: Mr.R.Vijayakumar AGP

¶11

for R.1 to R.6

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

(The Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice)

¶15

On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we direct that the representation of the petitioner dated 14.09.2016 be disposed of by the District Collector/2^nd respondent within one month of the receipt of the order, after notice to all concerned.

¶16

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(J) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ksr To 1.The State Mines and Mineral Development Department, Sand Quarry, Panaggal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. 2.The District Collector, District Collector's Office, Villupuram District. 3.The Superintendent of Police Villupuram. 4.The Tahsildar, Thirukovilur Taluk, Villupuram District. 5.The Water Resource/Development Department, P.W.D, Thirukovilur Taluk, Villupuram. 6.The Village Administrative Officer, Arulavadi Panchayat, Thirukovilur Taluk, Villupuram District. 1 cc to Mr.K. Sivakumar, Advocate Sr.55779 W.P.No.34199 of 2016 SK(CO) Eu 05.10.16

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Nakkeeran v. The State Mines and Mineral

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Nakkeeran v. The State Mines and Mineral

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.M.Dhinakaran Vs Mrs S.Annapoona

R. Venkataraman Vs S.T. Sundari

S. Thamizharasan Vs M/S Crescent Auto Repairs and

S.Selvi Vs The Secretary to the

C.Krishnan Vs The District Collector

Mrs.Kursheed Sharfudeen Vs The Inspector General of