Dismissed

Arulmigu Parvatheeswarar v. The District Collector

Madras HC8 Aug 2016WP/26735/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandate not to measure certain lands pursuant to a prior court order. The petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, which was then dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was recorded; the writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition were dismissed as withdrawn.

Arulmigu Parvatheeswarar Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.08.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN

¶5

W.P.No.26735 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.23027 of 2016

¶6

Arulmigu Parvatheeswarar Swami Thirukoil,
Injikudi
Rep. by its Executive Officer ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Thiruvarur.
2. The Tahsildar
Taluk Office, Nannilam.
3. The Taluk Sub-Inspector of Survey,
Taluk Office, Nannilam Taluk,
Nannilam, Thiruvarur District.
4. The President, District Consumer
Disputes Redressal Fourm, Thiruvarur.
5. G.Ramadoss ... Respondents
Prayer:

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 as not to take any action for measuring the lands bearing Old S.No.218/1 and bearing present S.No.306/2 to 306/9, Injikudi, Peralam Village, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District in pursuance of the order passed by this Honourable Court in C.R.P.No.1774 of 2003.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Natana Rajan

¶9

For Respondents : Mr.R.A.S.Senthilvel for R1 to R3 Additional Government Pleader

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶13

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pri
To
1. The District Collector,
Thiruvarur.
2. The Tahsildar
Taluk Office, Nannilam.
3. The Taluk Sub-Inspector of Survey,
Taluk Office, Nannilam Taluk,
Nannilam, Thiruvarur District.
4. The President, District Consumer
Disputes Redressal Fourm,
Thiruvarur.

¶14

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.45240

¶15

W.P.No.26735 of 2016
and
W.M.P.No.23027 of 2016

¶16

RSY(CO) CA(26/08/2016)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arulmigu Parvatheeswarar v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arulmigu Parvatheeswarar v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Vasudevan, Vs J.Indhumathi

M. Panneerselvam Vs the Secretary to Government

D.Balamurugan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Joint Liability Group NO.7 Vs the Sercretary to Government

M/s. Yogaa Manpower Agencies, Vs The Principal

Mr.S.R.Annamalai Vs The Adjudicating Authority