Petitioners sought quashing of suspension orders and reinstatement in service. The Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition under Article 226 by the petitioner's counsel and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.12.2016 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH W.P.No.21066 of 2007 and MP No.1 of 2007
1.P.S.Deva Raj (deceased)
2.D.Thenmozhi
3.D.Bhavanand 4.D.Vadhani 5.D.Prem Anand
6.D.Suthani 7.D.Kalyanand
8.D.Sridhani
9.S.Pappathi Petitioners
(P2 to P9 substituted as LRs of deceased P1-S.Deva Raj as per order of the Court dated 19.12.2016) and made in WMP.No.35044/16 in WP.No.21066/07)
Vs
1.The District Collector Perambalur Perambalur District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Ariyalur Perambalur District.
Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus in the nature of a writ calling for the records of the respondents, especially the second respondent relating to his proceedings made in R.C.A1/2603/2007 dated 27.04.2007 and quash the same as null and void, illegal and invalid and consequently, direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits apart from regularising the suspension period as duty period for all purposes disbursing the difference in his scale of pay.
For petitioner : Mr.A.Amalraj For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Special Govt.Pleader
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
true Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The District Collector
Perambalur
Perambalur District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer
Ariyalur
Perambalur District.
+1 cc to Mr.A.Amalraj Advocate sr 74254
W.P No.21066 of 2007
aa21/12/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed for quashing proceedings and reinstatement in service should be allowed or dismissed.
D. Thenmozhi and others
The District Collector
The Revenue Divisional Officer
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
