The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as it was voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with no costs awarded by the court.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.08.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
W.P.No.17360 of 2016
Mr.K.S.Karthikeyan,
Rep. by its Power of Attorney Agent of Mr.V.K.Subramaniam
.. Petitioner
vs.
1.The Inspector General of Registration,
Registration Department,
Government of Tamilnadu,
Pattinapakkam,
Chennai.
2.The District Registrar (Admin.)
Salem District,
Salem.
3.Saraswathy Victor
4.Selvadurai
5.Dairiyadurai .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 23.02.2016 in accordance with law within a time frame.
For Petitioner : M/s.R.M.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.S.Pattabiraman Government Advocate for R1 and R2 O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
ala(co)
krd 23/8
W.P.No.17360 of 2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. R.M. Venkatesh
Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Pattinapakkam, Chennai
District Registrar (Admin.), Salem District, Salem
Saraswathy Victor
Selvadurai
Dairiyadurai
M. Sathyanarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
