The single-bench contempt petition, filed to punish the respondent Tahsildar for non-compliance with a prior order, was dismissed after the court found the impugned order complied with by the issuance of proceedings No.2480/2014/A6.
Contempt petition closed; petitioner at liberty to challenge the Tahsildar's proceedings in the competent forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.08.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
Cont.P.No.1741 of 2016
P.Thirunavukkarasu .. Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Ganeshan
The Tahsildar
Thirutani Taluk,
Thiruvallur District,
Thiruvallur. .. Respondent
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for contempt of
the order of this Court made in W.P.No.19897 of 2015 dated
07.07.2015.
For Petitioner : M/s.P.Chandrasekar For Respondent : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, Government Advocate
O R D E R
It is represented that the order, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition, has been complied with by the respondent by passing a proceedings in Na.Ka.No.2480/2014/A6 dated 29.07.2016.
2
recorded. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the proceedings of the Tahsildar, Thiruttani Taluk dated 29.07.2016 in accordance with law before the competent forum.
jvm
SD/
JOINT REGISTRAR(OS)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2016.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
CO/12/08/2016
One CC to Government Pleader, SR.9388/2016
To
Mr.Ganeshan
The Tahsildar
Thirutani Taluk,
Thiruvallur District,
Thiruvallur.
P. Thirunavukkarasu
Mr. Ganeshan
M. Sathyananathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
