Disposed

R.Sakunthala, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC27 Apr 2016WP/14887/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single bench disposal of a writ petition directed the Inspector of Police to provide police protection to the petitioner to conduct an exhibition at Ambattur, citing threats and rowdy elements. The court recorded that a case had been registered and directed the police to act in accordance with the law.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 3rd respondent to provide police protection for the petitioner to conduct the exhibition as scheduled between 21.04.2016 and 30.05.2016.

R.Sakunthala, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.04.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

and W.M.P.13017 of 2016

¶6

R.Sakunthala ... Petitioner
Vs

¶7

1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Rep. By the Secretary to Government,
Tamil Development and Information
(Exhibition) Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The District Collector,
Thiruvallore,
Thiruvallore District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Ambattur Police Station,
Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053. ... Respondents

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3^rd respondent herein to provide police protection to the petitioner and her employees to conduct the Entertainment cum Household Articles Exhibition between 21.04.2016 to 30.05.2016 at CTH Road, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053 by taking appropriate action against the persons involved in threatening the petitioner.

¶9

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction, directing the 3^rd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner and her employees to conduct the Entertainment cum Household Articles Exhibition between 21.04.2016 to 30.05.2016 at CTH Road, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053 by taking appropriate action against the persons involved in threatening the petitioner.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the first respondent vide his proceedings in Letter No.4656/Exhibition/2016, dated 21.04.2016, granted permission to conduct an exhibition between 21.04.2016 to 30.05.2016 at CTH Road, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053. However, some rowdy elements have been entered into the said place and not allowed to continue their work and prevent them from being conducted the exhibition as scheduled and also demanded money. Therefore, the petitioner has given a representation before the third respondent police on 18.04.2016 for providing police protection. But, till date, the third respondent has not issued any order to grant police protection. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition.

¶12

The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the third respondent, on instructions, would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.876 of 2016 on 24.04.2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 143 and 188 IPC against one Bharathi and Mohan. The learned Additional Government Pleader would further submit that the third respondent is ready to provide police production to the petitioner. The third respondent is present before this Court.

¶13

Recording the submission of the learned Additional Government Pleader, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.04.2016, and provide police protection, to conduct the Entertainment cum Household Articles Exhibition between 21.04.2016 to 30.05.2016 at CTH Road, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053, in accordance with law.

¶14

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

-s/d-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶19

vsm

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

¶22

1.The Secretary to Government, Tamil Development and Information (Exhibition) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶23

2.The District Collector, Thiruvallore, Thiruvallore District.

¶24

3.The Inspector of Police, Ambattur Police Station, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053.

¶25

+2 ccs to Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan Advocate vide sr.26230
+1 cc to Government Pleader vide sr.26633
W.P.No.14887 of 2016
aa28/04/2016

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Sakunthala, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Sakunthala, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Manimaran Vs G.Sarangapani

P.Mani Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

L.Selvaraj Vs Mr.Vetrivendan

Thulasiammal Vs State Rep by

Shaik Mubarak Vs the Inspector of Police

Aleem Basha Vs Smt.M.Faaiza Samreen