Disposed

R.Selvakani v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Madras HC18 Jan 2016WP/1388/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to consider a representation regarding a bunker shop under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, and to refrain from eviction. The court disposed of the petition on the same lines as a prior Division Bench decision.

What did the court decide?

Disposed on the same lines as per W.P. No.18397 of 2014. No costs. Connected matters closed.

R.Selvakani Vs The Government of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.01.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

W.P.No.1388 of 2016 and WMP.No.1156 of 2016

¶6

R.Selvakani .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by its Secretary Local Administration Dept.
Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 3.
3.The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai,
EVK Sampath Road, Vepery,Chennai - 7. .. Respondents

¶7

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 19.10.2015 as per the provisions of Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, and till and final decision is taken thereon, forbearing the respondents and their subordinates in any manner evicting or disturbing the bunk shop run by the petitioner at No.16/35, 11th Avenue, Near Circle Library, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 83.

¶8

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned standing counsel for the respondents and with their consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on his representation dated 19.10.2015 as per the provisions of Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, and till and final decision is taken thereon, forbearing the respondents and their subordinates in any manner evicting or disturbing the bunk shop run by the petitioner at No.16/35, 11th Avenue, Near Circle Library, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 83.

¶11

3.The issue involved in this writ petition is covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P.No.18397 of 2014 etc. batch (B.Noor Ahmed V. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government and others) dated 30.09.2015.

¶12

4.In the light of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed
of on the same lines as per the decision of the Hon'ble Division
Bench in W.P.No.18397 of 2014 etc. batch dated 30.09.2015. No
costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Cs-V)
/TRUE COPY/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
Sgl
To
1.The Secretary Local Administration Dept.
The Government of Tamil Nadu
Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 3.
3.The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai,
EVK Sampath Road, Vepery,Chennai - 7.
+1 CC to MR.S.Pushpakaran Advocate. SR.NO.2827
+1 CC to MR.P.V.Selvakumar Advocate. SR.NO. 2560
+1 CC to Govt.Pleader. SR.NO. 2723
W.P.No.1388 of 2016
CO-MSM
JD 27/01/2016

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Selvakani v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Selvakani v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sithan @ Madhu Vs the Director

The Management, Vs K.Dhanaraj

S.Velayutham Vs K.Sowrirajan

Munvar Sheriff Vs The Zonal Officer

K.Karuppudaiyar Vs The Commissioner of Town &

Sai Ram Matriculation School Vs The State of Tamilnadu