Disposed

Dr.Keerthika.S. v. Government of Tamil nadu

Madras HC25 Apr 2016WP/13787/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged the allotment list for a self-financing MD General Medicine seat, seeking to be considered under the BC service category. The court, treating it as a service candidate matter based on specific Government Orders, directed the authorities to reconsider the petitioner's case after affording a personal hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent authority to treat the petitioner as a service candidate and pass an order within six weeks after a personal hearing.

Dr.Keerthika.S. Vs Government of Tamil nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 25.04.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶5

W.P.No. 13787 of 2016 and WMP.Nos.12095 to 12097 of 2016

¶6

Dr. Keerthika.S. No.19/1, VOC Street, PRS Road, Chennimalai, Erode. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort. St.George, Chennai – 9.

¶7

The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, No.359, Anna Salai, DMS Complex, Chennai - 600 006.

¶8

The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶9

Medical Service Recruitment Board, rep. by its Secretary, 7^th floor, DMS building, 359, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 006.

¶10

Tamilnadu Public Service Commission, rep. by its secretary, Frazer Birdge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai, Tamilnadu – 600 003. 6. The Secretary, Selection Committee, Director of Medical Education, 162, E.V.K.Periyarsalai, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Dr.Ratheesh Anandh. S., Exam No.54810 Rank 699, Communication through Secretary, Selection Committee Director of Medical Education, 162, E.V.K.Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶13

Dr. Arul Venkadesh, G., Exam No.56105, Rank 745, communication through Secretary, Selection Committee Director of Medical Education, 162, E.V.K. Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. ... Respondents

¶14

Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned order of list of selection and allotment dated 06.04.2016 issued by the 6^th respondent so far as the 7^th and 8^th respondent to MD General Medicine Specialty course self financing seat Rajah Muthiah Medical College & Hospital (Annamalai University) under BC service, quash the same and direct the 6^th respondent to allot the seat in MD General Medicine Specialty Course self financing seat Rajah Muthiah Medical College & Hospital (Annamalai University) under BC service to the petitioner.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar For respondents : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, Government Advocate For R1 O R D E R

¶16

With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶17

The petitioner has come forward with the present Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned order of list of selection and allotment dated 06.04.2016 issued by the 6^th respondent so far as the 7^th and 8^th respondent to MD General Medicine Specialty course self financing seat Rajah Muthiah Medical College & Hospital (Annamalai University) under BC service, quash the same and direct the 6^th respondent to allot the seat in MD General Medicine Specialty Course self financing seat Rajah Muthiah Medical College & Hospital (Annamalai University) under BC service to the petitioner.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Though very many contentions have been raised in this writ petition, at the time of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would be suffice, if the petitioner was considered as a service candidate in the light of the GO.(D).No.349, dated 29.02.2016 and G.O.No.726, dated 05.07.2013.

¶20

Heard the submissions of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to give a fresh representation along with a copy of this order to sixth respondent within a period of two weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the sixth respondent is directed to consider the same in the light of the GO.(D).No.349, dated 29.02.2016 and G.O.No.726, dated 05.07.2013 and pass appropriate order, within a period of six weeks thereon, after affording opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

¶22

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort. St.George, Chennai – 9. 2. The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, No.359, Anna Salai, DMS Complex, Chennai - 600 006. 3. The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

Medical Service Recruitment Board, rep. by its Secretary, 7^th floor, DMS building, 359, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 006.

¶25

Tamilnadu Public Service Commission, rep. by its secretary, Frazer Birdge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai, Tamilnadu – 600 003. 6. The Secretary, Selection Committee, Director of Medical Education, 162, E.V.K.Periyarsalai, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. 7. Dr.Ratheesh Anandh. S., Exam No.54810 Rank 699, Communication through Secretary, Selection Committee Director of Medical Education, 162, E.V.K.Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶26

Dr. Arul Venkadesh, G., Exam No.56105, Rank 745, communication through Secretary, Selection Committee Director of Medical Education, 162, E.V.K. Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶27

+1 cc to Mr.D.Prabhu mukkunth Arunkumar Advocate sr.25517 +1 cc to M/s.Government Pleader vide sr.26336

¶28

W.P.No.13787 of 2016

¶29

aa29/04/2016

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr.Keerthika.S. v. Government of Tamil nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Keerthika.S. v. Government of Tamil nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.P. Ramar Vs The Inspector of Police

M/s. Valvil Ori Transport Vs Indian Oil corporation Ltd.

A.S.Media Vs The Inspector of Police

M/s.Seahorse Marine Vs The Chairman

R.Murugesan, Vs The Inspector of Police

V.P.Mohan Kumar, Vs The Tahsildar