The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel accepted that the relief sought no longer survived for adjudication.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.02.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Writ Petition No.13640 of 2003
V.Gopal
Proprietor
Baskar Agarbathis ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. Union of India rep. by
Secretary to Government,
Ministry of Law, Justice and
Company Affairs, New Delhi.
2. Canara Bank,
rep. by its Authorised Officer,
Periyamittoor Branch,
Periyamittoor – 632 516.
Vellore District. ... Respondents
Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records relating to notice in reference 75 CR: 202: 2003 dated 09.04.2003 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Parivallal
For Respondents : Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao (R1)
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rk
To
The Secretary to Government,
Union of India, Ministry of Law, Justice and
Company Affairs, New Delhi.
+1cc to Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao, Advocate, S.R.No.8129
W.P.No.13640 of 2003
LRS(CO)
CA(19/02/2016)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Gopal
Union of India
Canara Bank
R. Subbiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
