The Court directed the Registry to rectify clerical errors in the certified order copy regarding the names of counsels for petitioners and respondents.
Direct the Registry to issue a fresh order copy correcting the names of the counsels for petitioners and respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
W.P.No.12573 of 2011
N.Kirubakaran, J.,
This matter is listed today, under the caption "For Being
Mentioned".
2 . The learned counsel appearing for petitioners pointed out that,
due to inadvertence, two errors have occurred in the order passed in the above Writ Petition, dated 16.06.2016, more specifically, in the portion just below the prayer portion, which records the appearance of the counsels. Firstly, it is pointed out that though Mr.S.Sathia Chandran, is the learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of petitioners, and the original order also reflects his name as counsel for petitioners, in the certified order copy issued by the Registry, the name of Mr.A.Vijayakumar, has been mentioned
as counsel for petitioners. Second error is that, the respondents were not represented by Mr.V.Jaya Prakash Narayanan, Special Government Pleader, as mentioned in the original order, but, by the learned counsel, Mr.A.Vijayakumar, whose name has been mistakenly shown as learned
counsel for petitioners in the certified order copy, as stated above. Therefore,
2
he prayed that the said errors two may be rectified and amended order copy may be issued.
3 . Heard Mr.A.Vijayakumar, learned counsel for respondents, and
this Court also noted the abovesaid defects pointed out by the learned counsel for petitioners in the original order as well as certified order copy issued by the Registry, which is circulated by the counsel for petitioners for reference. In view of the same, Registry is directed to delete the name of Mr.V.Jaya Prakash Narayanan, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents, and substitute the name of Mr.A.Vijaykumar, as counsel for respondents and
in the fresh order copy to be issued, mention the name of Mr.S.Sathia Chandran, as counsel for petitioners. To be specific, the portion denoting the
appearance of the counsels should be mentioned in the following manner:-
"For Petitioners : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For Respondents : Mr.A.Vijayakumar"
07.10.2016
sd
N.Kirubakaran, J.,
3
sd
W.P.No.12573 of 2011
07.10.2016
N.Kirubakaran
Mr.S.Sathia Chandran
Mr.A.Vijayakumar
Mr.V.Jaya Prakash Narayanan
N.Kirubakaran, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
