M.Arumuga Reddiar v. T.Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 11 were dismissed as withdrawn by the high court. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.09.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
O.S.A.No.104 of 2011
and
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011
M.Arumuga Reddiar .. Appellant
vs
1.T.Kumar
2.V.Krishnamoorthy
3.Chandrasekar
4.T.Vanitha .. Respondents
Appeals filed under Order XXXVI, Rule 11 of Original Side
Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
dated 06.07.2010 made in O.A.No.267 of 2010 in C.S.No.210 of
2010.
For Appellant .. Mr.R.Rajaramani
For Respondents .. No Appearance
* * * * *
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by
The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw
the appeal. Endorsement has been made.
2. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Consequently, M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 are closed.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
O.S.A.No.104 of 2011
The Sub Assistant Registrar, Original Side, High Court, Madras.
aa16/09/2016
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Arumuga Reddiar
- respondent
T. Kumar
Coram
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court