Allowed

V.Kumar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC6 Jan 2016WP/115/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions filed under Article 226 sought a mandate directing respective Regional Transport Officers to receive applications for autorickshaw permits and pass orders. The court dismissed merits but ordered receipt and consideration of applications within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respective Regional Transport Officers to receive applications, consider them, and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

V.Kumar Vs The Regional Transport Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.01.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.115 to 123 of 2016

¶6

V.Kumar ... Petitioner in WP.115/2016 G.Anbalagan ... Petitioner in WP.116/2016 R.Kaliyaperumal ... Petitioner in WP.117/2016 K.R.Balaji ... Petitioner in WP.118/2016 V.Balaji ... Petitioner in WP.119/2016 G.Rajaraman ... Petitioner in WP.120/2016 E.B.Srinivasan ... Petitioner in WP.121/2016 R.Lokesh Raja ... Petitioner in WP.122/2016 S.Murali ... Petitioner in WP.123/2016 Vs The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South West, Chennai – 600 092. ... Respondent in WP.115, 116, 117 and 118/2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Tambaram, Chennai – 600 045. ... Respondent in WP.119/2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Poonamallee, Chennai – 600 056. ... Respondent in WP.120/2016 The Regional Transport Officer, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053. ... Respondent in WP.121, 122 and 123/2016

¶7

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respective respondent herein to receive the applications of the petitioner dated 20.11.2015, in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

grant of Autorickshaw Permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶10

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking the common relief of issuing a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Regional Transport Authority concerned to receive the respective application of the petitioners in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of autorickshaw permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶11

Mr.A.Rajaperumal, learned Government Advocate takes
notice for the respective respondent.
3. Without going into the merits of the matters, these
writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respective
Regional Transport Officer concerned to receive the applications
of the petitioners, consider the same and pass appropriate
orders for grant of autorickshaw permit, on merits and in
accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date
of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
rk Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
1.The Regional Transport Officer,
Chennai South West,
Chennai – 600 092.
2.The Regional Transport Officer,
Tambaram,
Chennai – 600 045.
3.The Regional Transport Officer,
Poonamallee,
Chennai – 600 056.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

4.The Regional Transport Officer, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053.

¶14

- 9 ccs to Mr.K.Hariharan, Advocate Sr 777

¶15

- 1 cc to The Govt.Pleader, Sr 966

¶16

AK/CO KR/21/1/16

¶17

W.P.Nos.115 to 123 of 2016

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Kumar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Kumar v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Laksh Logistics, Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Mahindra Residential Vs The Commissioner of Income-Tax

M/s. Shree Bhahubali Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Tamilnadu Steel Tubes Ltd. Vs the Assistant Commissioner

M/S.Pepsicola India Marketing Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

T.S.Ramanathan Vs the Commercial Tax Officer