Dismissed
M/S.Pepsicola India Marketing v. the Commercial Tax Officer
Madras HCWP/15265/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.01.2016
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.Mahadevan
Writ Petition Nos.15265 to 15267 of 2004
and
W.P.M.P.Nos.18128 to 18130 of 2004
M/s.Pepsicola India Marketing (P) Ltd., 90, Anna Salai, Wellington Plaza, 3rd Floor, Chennai - 600 002.
... Petitioner in all W.Ps. Vs.
The Commercial Tax Officer, Triplicane I Assessment Circle, Chennai. ... Respondent in all W.Ps.
Prayer in W.P.No.15265 of 2004
Writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in TNGST/0560540/97-98, dated 05.05.2004, on his file and to quash the same.
Prayer in W.P.No.15266 of 2004
Writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in TNGST/0560540/20002001, dated 24.05.2004, on his file and to quash the same.
Prayer in W.P.No.15267 of 2004
Writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in TNGST/0560540/98-99, dated 05.05.2004, on his file and to quash the same.
For Petitioner :Mr.B.Raveendran for M/s.Chandran Karuppiah Associates
For Respondent :Mr.S.Manoharan,
Additional Government Pleader
COMMON O R D E R
As the issue involved in these Writ Petitions and the parties are one and the same, these Writ Petitions are taken up together and disposed of vide this common order.
limitation and pass necessary orders within six weeks on merits and in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai and anotherDistinguished¶23
E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai and another reported in (2005) 141 STC 12 (SC)
M/s. Pepsicola India Marketing (P) Ltd.
The Commercial Tax Officer, Triplicane I Assessment Circle, Chennai
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court