The President, v. C.Munian
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear despite notices and did not submit any representation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.02.2016 Coram
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam
Writ Petition No.10520 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
The President, Nerkunapet and Post, Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. ...Petitioner Vs. 1. C.Munian O.H.T. Operator, 12, Veeraraghapuram Colony, Near Nerkunapet, Anaikattu Posst, Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram District – 603 312. 2. The Assistant Director (AD) Village Panchayat Rural Development Department, Office of the District Collector, Kancheepuram District. 3. The Block Development Officer, Village Panchayat, Ilathur Village Panchayat Union Office, Pounchur Post, Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. 4. The President Officer, III Additional Labour Court,Chennai. ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for records pertaining to the Award, dated 31.10.2013, passed in I.D.No.661 of 2010, on the file of the fourth respondent and to quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venugopal (No appearance)
For Respondents 2 to 3 : Mr.R.Rajeswaran Special Government Pleader Respondent -4 : Labour Court
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The President, Nerkunapet and Post, Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
- respondent
C.Munian O.H.T. Operator
- respondent
The Assistant Director (AD) Village Panchayat Rural Development Department
- respondent
The Block Development Officer
- respondent
The President Officer, III Additional Labour Court, Chennai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court