M/s.Jai Hind Wire Rod Mills v. The Additional Commissioner of
Madras HCWMP/9118/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in W.P.No.3954 of 2016 M.DURAISWAMY,J. Heard…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
W.M.P.No.9118 of 2016 in W.P.No.3954 of 2016
¶2
M.DURAISWAMY,J.
¶3
Heard both sides.
¶4
- 2.The learned counsel for the respondents
¶5
has no objection for ordering the petition.
¶6
3.In view of the same, the petition is
¶7
ordered.
¶8
4.The Registry is directed to carry out the
¶9
amendment in the papers.
¶10
va
¶11
26.04.2016 (1/2)
Coram
AI extract
M.DURAISWAMY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court