Disposed

A.Velankanni v. The District Collector

Madras HC25 Apr 2016WP/14784/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of two writ petitions filed seeking mandamus to release seized heavy goods vehicles. Instead of passing first instance orders on merits, the Court directed the petitioners to submit representations and the covered order to the respondents within one week, upon receipt of which the respondents must pass orders on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to submit representations and this order to respondents within one week; respondents directed to pass orders on merits within four weeks of receipt.

A.Velankanni Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 25.04.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.14784 and 14785 of 2016

¶6

A. Velankanni ..... Petitioner in W.P.No.14784 of 2016

¶7

V. Kalaimani ..... Petitioner in W.P.No.14785 of 2016

¶8

¶9

The District Collector, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District

¶10

The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶11

Madhuranthagam, Kancheepuram District .... Respondents in both the petitions

¶12

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue Writs of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the Heavy Goods Vehicles bearing Registration Nos.TN.20.AX.4254 and TN.05.W.4221, which were seized by the second respondent herein on 01.04.2016 and thereby consider the petitioners' representations dated 04.04.2016 and pass orders.

¶13

For petitioners :Mr.P. Murali For respondents :Mr.A. Zakir Hussain Government Advocate

¶14

COMMON ORDER

¶15

The petitioners have filed the writ petitions for issuance of Writs of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the Heavy Goods Vehicles bearing Registration Nos.TN.20.AX.4254 and TN.05.W.4221, which were seized by the second respondent herein on 01.04.2016 by considering the petitioners' representations dated 04.04.2016 and pass orders.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioners are the owners of the vehicles, bearing Nos.TN.20.AX.4254 and TN.05.W.4221. The petitioners transported one load of sand, without any valid bill or permission of the Government. Hence the vehicles were seized by the second respondent and case was registered against the petitioners under Section 21 of the Tamil Nadu Mine and Minerals Act. According to the petitioners, the sand was transported only for their personal use and therefore, the petitiones gave representations before the respondents on 04.04.2016.

¶18

Mr.A. Zakir Hussain, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents, submitted that in an identical matter, in W.P.No.4989 of 2016 dated 10.02.2016, this Court permitted the petitioner to submit a copy of the representation, seeking for release of the vehicle, in question, along with the copy of the order passed in the writ petion and on receipt of the said representation and the copy of the order, the respondents were directed to consider the same and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. The learned Government Advocate also submitted that similar order can be passed in the present writ petitions.

¶19

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the writ petitioners, without expressing any opinion with regard to the mertis of the case, I permit the petitioners to submit a copy of the representations dated 04.04.2016, seeking release of the vehicles, along with a copy of this order, to the respondents, within one week from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the respondents are directed to consider the representations and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereafter. With these observations, both the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

The District Collector, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District

¶26

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madhuranthagam, Kancheepuram District

¶27

+2cc to Mr.P.Murali, Advocate Sr.25363

¶28

W.P.Nos.14784 and 14785 of 2016
bvr(CO)
srg(25/04/2016)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Velankanni v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Velankanni v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahalaxmi Inn Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Managing Director

M. Sumathy Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax

C.Ravindran, Vs Secretary, Regional Transport

V.Palaniammal, Vs the Tamil Nadu Small

D. Maran Vs The State Transport Authority

B.Jayakumar, Vs The Transport Commissioner