Dismissed

The Chairman v. R.Sathiyapriya

Madras HC26 Apr 2016WA(MD)/799/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ appeal filed by the Chairman of the Teachers Recruitment Board. The Special Government Pleader submitted that the appellant had been appointed as a Graduate Assistant, rendering the appeal subservient. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ appeal and the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ appeal and connected miscellaneous petition were dismissed with no costs awarded.

The Chairman Vs R.Sathiyapriya — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 26.04.2016

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR

¶6

and

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶8

W.A.(MD)No.799 of 2016

¶9

and

¶10

CMP(MD)No.4855 of 2016

¶11

The Chairman,

¶12

Teachers Recruitment Board, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

... Appellants

Vs.

1.R.Sathiyapriya

2.The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai – 20. (2^nd appellant transposed as 2^nd respondent vide order dated 26.04.2016 made in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013) ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause XV of Letters of Patent, against the common order dated 21.01.2013 made in W.P.(MD)No.16279 of 2012.

¶18

Prayer in WP(MD). 16279/ 2012 :

¶19

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned result of certificate verification published in the official website of the 1st respondent http://trb.tn.nic.in dated 05.12.2012 in so far as the petitioner is concerned, quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to appoint the petitioner.

¶20

For Appellants : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan Special Government Pleader

¶21

For R1 :No Appearance

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

For R2 :Mr.Muthu Geethaiyian

¶24

¶25

JUDGMENT

¶26

(Judgment of this Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)

¶27

By consent of both the parties, the writ appeal itself is taken up for final hearing.

¶28

2.On this day, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader submitted that vide order in Rc.No.029/LC/TET/2013, dated 21.11.2013, the first respondent has been appointed as Graduate Assistant in English. Added further, he submitted that in other identical matters, orders of appointment has been issued to the eligible candidates.

¶29

3.Copy of the proceedings in Rc.No.029/LC/TET/2013, dated 21.11.2013, issued by the Member Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, Chennai, produced before this Court, is treated as part of record.

¶30

4.In view of the above submission, nothing survives in this writ appeal for further adjudication. Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

Assistant Registrar(W)

¶33

/True copy/

¶34

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶35

¶36

The Chairman,

¶37

Teachers Recruitment Board,

¶38

College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶39

+one cc to The Special Government Pleader in SR.No.24197 rj2

¶40

CSL/SDR-SH/09.05.2016 :2P/3C

¶41

W.A.(MD)No.799 of 2016 26.04.2016

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Chairman v. R.Sathiyapriya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Chairman v. R.Sathiyapriya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kasupandiammal, Vs Subbulakshmi

The Management Vs the Presiding Officer

The Secretary Vs K.Solomon Jeyaraj

A.Prabhu, Vs the Authorized Officer

The Member Secretary Cum Vs J.Punitha

The State of Tamilnadu Vs B.Muthupriya