B.V Sampath v. T.A Krishnasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
This Second Appeal was dismissed as abated because the appellants were deceased, their legal heirs were not impleaded, and neither party showed interest in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as abated; no costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
Dated:09.12.2016
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Second Appeal No.91 of 1999
1.B.V.Sampath 2.B.V.Shanmugam
..Appellants
/vs/
1.T.A.Siddappa Mudaliar 2.T.S.Jagadeesan 3.Naria A.Murugesa Mudaliar 4.Naria A.Krishnan 5.Naria A.Gurunathan 6.E.Thiruvengadam 7.Thikkai Kuppathi Mudali
..Respondents
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 6.11.1982 in A.S.No.179 of 1981 on the file of the Sub Court, Vellore reversing the judgment dated 31.3.1981 in O.S.No.295/1977 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sholinghur.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal can be proceeded with when the appellants are deceased and their legal heirs are not interested.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
B.V.Sampath
- appellant
B.V.Shanmugam
- respondent
T.A.Siddappa Mudaliar
- respondent
T.S.Jagadeesan
- respondent
Naria A.Murugesa Mudaliar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court