V.Rangarajan v. v.Subramaniam
Case brief
What is this about?
Court allowed CMP to return original sale deed (Ex.B1) upon submission of certified copy and undertaking for future production, expediting the copy application pending in the trial court.
What did the court decide?
C.M.P. allowed; Registry to expedite certified copy application; Petitioner to give undertaking for original document.
What the court decided
1
C.M.P.No.19859 of 2016 in SECOND APPEAL No.1641 of 2001
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN.J.,
The petitioner/appellant has taken out this application to get back the original sale deed dated 28.10.1980 marked as Exhibit.B1, before the trial Court in O.S.No.241 of 1998 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam.
- The said document was filed by the petitioner in the trial Court and was admitted as evidence and assigned as Exhibit.B1. The plaintiff who lost the case before the courts below has preferred the Second Appeal.
- Pending Second Appeal, he has entered into compromise with
the respondent and by consent filed a memo to that effect in the main Second Appeal.
- Today, this Court has recorded the memo and dispose of the Second Appeal in accordance with the memo.
2
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN.J., nvi
- The petitioner/appellant seeks return of Ex.B1 for other purpose. This Court is of the view that the original may be returned to the petitioner/first defendant by substituting it with the certified copy of the Exhibit.B1. It is submitted by the representing counsel for the petitioner, that he has already taken out an application for certified copy of Exhibit.B1 and the copy application is pending for compliance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner/Appellant
- respondent
Respondent
- other
Plaintiff
- other
First Defendant
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court