In an appeal filed against a decree confirming the judgment of a District Munsiff, the High Court dismissed the second appeal as the third appellant, representing the deceased vendors, submitted a memorandum stating a compromise was reached and a sale deed was executed in their favour, declaring the matter settled.
Second appeals dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.11.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
S.A.Nos.1535 and 1536 of 1995
(3rd appellant is brought on record as LR of the deceased 2nd appellant vide as per order of this Court dated 11.07.2003 made in CMP.No.2142 of 2003 ... Appellants in SA.No.1535 of 1995 / Appellants/ Defendants
(Respondents 3 to 5 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st respondent vide order of this Court dated 05.11.2009 made in CMP.Nos.
152 to 157of 2009 in S.A.No. 1535 & 1536 of 1995) ... Respondents in both SAs./ Respondents/ Plaintiffs
Prayer in SA.No.1535 of 1995:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Sub Judge, Kancheepuram, dated 28.07.1995 in A.S.No.31/1993 confirming the judgement and decree of the learned District Munsiff, Tiruthanni, dated 22.02.1993 in O.S.No.261/1983.
Prayer in SA.No.1536 of 1995:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and
decree passed by the learned Sub Judge, Kancheepuram, dated 28.07.1995 in A.S.No.32/1993 confirming the judgement and decree of the learned District Munsiff, Tiruthanni, dated 22.02.1993 in O.S.No.37/1984.
For Appellants : No appearance in both SAs For Respondents : R1 and R2 died in both SAs Mr.V.C.Venkataraman for R3 to R5
COMMON JUDGMENT
When the second appeal came up for hearing on 10.11.2016, There was no representation for the appellants as well as the respondents. Therefore, this Court issued notice to the appellants as well as the respondents.
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar rts To
Copy to
The Section Officer VR Section, High Court, Madras
S.A.Nos.1535 and 1536 of 1995
GJ II(CO) kk 29/12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal is maintainable in view of the compromise entered between the parties and sale deed executed in favour of the third appellant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh @ Sunderesan
N.Venkatesan
V.G.Ramasamy Aiyer
Kanagavalli Ammal
R.Jayanthi
Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
