V.Karuppannan v. Ponnammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals regarding civil decrees were dismissed on the ground that there were no instructions from the parties, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
The second appeals are dismissed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
S.A.Nos. 1297 and 1298 of 1998
V.Karuppannan ...Appellant/Appellant/Defendant in both SAs
Vs. Ponnammal ...Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff in both S.As.
Prayer in S.A.No. 1297 of 1998 :- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 31.12.1997 passed in A.S.No. 262 of 1996 on the file of the I Additional District Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode by confirming the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No. 15 of 1991 dated 30.08.1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Gobichettipalayam.
Prayer in S.A.No. 1298 of 1998 :- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment passed in A.S.No.263 of 1996 dated 31.12.1997 on the file of the I Additional District Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode and confirming the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.270 of 1990 dated 30.08.1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Gobichettipalayam.
For Appellant in both Appeals : Mr.J.Manikkam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V. Karuppannan
- respondent
Ponnammal
Coram
G. Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court