Varavenappa v. Maravenappa
Case brief
What is this about?
This Second Appeal was dismissed for default. No appearance was made on behalf of the appellants despite notice.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for default. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.12.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
S.A.No.194 of 1999
1 Varavenappa
2 Muniraju @ Muniappa
3 Govindappa, S/o.Varavenappa
4 Govindappa, S/o.Kempiah
5 Varavenappa @ Srinivasan
...Appellants
Vs.
Maravenappa ...Respondent
Prayer:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil
Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 17.9.96 in
A.S.No.51/96 on the file of the Sub-Ordinate Court, Hosur
confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 30.6.95 in
O.S.No.241/93 on the file of the District Munsif, Dekanikottai.
For Appellants : No Appearance
For Respondent : Ms.V.Srimathi
ORDER
When the Second Appeal came up for hearing on 12.12.2016,
the learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo stating that
he has given change of vakalat on 22.04.2013 and also returned
the entire papers. In view of the same, office was directed to
print the name of the appellants in the cause list and post on
15.12.2016.
- Today, the matter was listed showing the name of the appellants and their counsel. When the matter was called the appellants absent and no representation for the appellants.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Varavenappa & Ors.
- respondent
Maravenappa
Coram
G. Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court