Review Application filed to challenge the finality of this Court's order dismissing CRP (NPD). The Court held the Supreme Court order had attained finality, the application did not show error apparent on the face of the record, and thus dismissed the Review Application.
Review Application dismissed; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.03.2016
CORAM
THE Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
Review Application No.28 of 2016 and CMP Nos.2147 and 4343 of 2016
Dr.Muthian Sivathanu
.... Petitioner
vs
Nalii Muthian
..... Respondent
Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code read with Sec.114 of Civil Procedure Code to review the order dated 10.12.2015 made in CRP (NPD) No.4728 of 2014 against IA No.606 of 2014 in FCOP No.3835 of 2011 by the II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.
For petitioner : Mr.M. Sivathanu
2
ORDER
The petitioner in CRP (NPD) No.4728 of 2014, who is the husband of the respondent, has filed the above Review application to review the order, passed by this Court on 10.12.2015, in CRP (NPD)No.4728 of 2014.
3
reached finality.
4
M. DURAISWAMY, J.,
sr
the face of the record. The Review Application is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Since the Review Application is dismissed by this Court today, the miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
23-03-2016
sr
Index:no website:yes
To
II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.
Rev.APpln.No.28/2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC permits re-argument of the matter already disposed of by the Court.
Whether error apparent on the face of the record exists given that the Review Application merely reiterates earlier arguments.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Muthian Sivathanu
Nalii Muthian
M. DURAIASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
