In an absence of counsel for the appellants who had sought previous adjournments, the High Court dismissed the Original Side Appeal by default, awarding costs.
The Original Side Appeal is dismissed for default, with cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 3.10.2016
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.SELVAM
and
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.KALAIYARASAN
O.S.A.No.123 of 2012
1. M/s.Madras Elastomers Limited
2. Mr.Subash C Saraff
Chairman and Managing Director
of the first defendant .. Appellants
Vs.
Kamal Chand .. Respondent
This Appeal is preferred under Order XXXVI Rule (I) of
O.S.Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act against the
order of this Court dated 7.6.2011 in C.S.No.429 of of 2000.
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.G.Kalyan for
M/s.Surana and Surana
JUDGMENT
(JUDGMENT OF THE COURT WAS DELIVERED
BY A.SELVAM, J.)
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent is
present, whereas the learned counsel appearing for the
appellants is not present.
Even in an earlier hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants has sought adjournment. Under such circumstances, this Original Side Appeal has been posted today. Since the
learned counsel appearing for the appellants is not present today, the Original Side Appeal is dismissed for default, with cost.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Sub Assistant Registrar,
Original Side,
High Court, Madras.
O.S.A.No.123 of 2012
sm[co]
srg 07/10/2016
M/s.Madras Elastomers Limited
Mr.Subash C Saraff
Kamal Chand
A.SELVAM
P.KALAIYARASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
