Dismissed

Amlu v. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

Madras HC3 Oct 2016HCP/982/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition to quash the detention order of Sathish Kumar. The court noted that the Government of Tamil Nadu had already revoked the detention order via G.O. No.2172 dated 18.05.2016, rendering the petition infructuous and dismissing it.

What did the court decide?

None. The petition was dismissed because the detention order was already revoked by the Government.

Amlu Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.10.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN

¶5

H.C.P.No.982 of 2016

¶6

Amlu ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs. 1. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. By Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Chennai. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of habeas corpus, to call for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 27.02.2016 in 209/2016/BCDFGISSV/2016, is detaining the detenu under 2(F) of Tamilnadu Act of 1982, as a GOONDA and quash the same and direct the Respondents to produce the detenu Sathish @ Sathish Kumar, S/o.Baskar, aged about 24 years, who is detained at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai 600 066 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sundararajan For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM,J.)

¶9

This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records relating to order of detention, dated 27.02.2016, passed in BCDFGISSSV No.209/2016, by the detaining authority,

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

who has been arrayed as second respondent herein, against the detenu, by name Sathish @ Sathish Kumar, S/o Baskar and quash the same.

¶12

2.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has represented that the detention order in question has already been revoked by the Government of Tamil Nadu by virtue of G.O. Rt. No.2172, Home, Prohibition and Excise (X) Department dated 18.05.2016 and to that effect, a copy of the same has been submitted for perusal and this Court has perused the same and ultimately found that the detention order in question has already been revoked.

¶13

Considering the fact that the detention order in question has already been revoked by the Government, the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous.

¶14

In fine, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed.

¶15

Sd/Assistant Registrar(J)

¶16

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶17

sra To 1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Chennai. 3. The Joint Secretary to Government, Public(Law & Order), Fort Saint George, Chennai - 9. 4. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. 5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. H.C.P.No.982 of 2016

¶18

RP(CO) CA(22/10/2016)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Amlu v. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amlu v. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Krishnasamy Vs S.Vijayakumar

Anandhi Vs The Chief General Manager

G.Muthukumaran, Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Mahendran Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

Arun Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

Saraswathi Vs the State of Tamil Nadu