Dismissed
Kalatheeswaran v. Mrs. Valarmathi & 12 Others
Madras HCCS/520/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10 . 1…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.11.2 0 1 6
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.S.No.5 2 0 of 2010
And
A.Nos. 2919/201 0 & 607/201 2
... Plaintiffs
Vs.
2
PRAYER : This Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 O.S. Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 CPC, praying for the following reliefs:
(a) direct partition all the properties mentioned in item Nos. 1 to VI in the schedule together in common and share 1/4th equal share to the plaintiffs along with the 6th defendant, 11th defendant, 12th defendant and 13th defendant allotting the portion or portions as the plaintiffs and the 6th defendant, 11th defendant, 12th defendant and 13th defendant are put in use and deliver possession by metes and bounds of each of the properties for the convenient enjoyment of each party with all the damages to the party who is eligible to the extent taken into account the advantage, disadvantage, prominence and market value of each property;
(b) Award mesne profit to the extent the plaintiffs and 6th , 11th , 12th and 13th defendants are eligible to the extent of Rs.30,000/- per month from 01.10.2006 till this date totaling in all Rs.10,80,000/-;
© to relegate the proceedings to the separate proceedings for determining the future profit; and
3
The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs has made an endorsement
in the plaint that he has not received any further instructions from the plaintiffs.
2. As directed earlier, the names of the plaintiffs have been printed.
There is no representation on behalf of the plaintiffs.
3. Hence, the suit is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently,
connected applications are closed. No costs.
10.11.2016
vsg
4
5
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.
vsg
C.S.No.5 2 0 of 2010
And
A.Nos. 2919/201 0 & 607/201 2
10.11.2 0 1 6
6
Kalatheeswaran and others
Mrs. Valarmathi and others
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court