3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has purchased the property in question by virtue of sale deed, dated 30.10.2015 registered on the file of the Sub Registrar, Thiruvallikeni in Doc.No.1457 of 2015 and the defacto complainant is the lessee in respect of one portion in the second floor of the property. He further submitted that the petitioner has paid the entire lease amount to the defacto complainant in the presence of the previous owner on 11.12.2015 and he agreed to quit and deliver the possession. After receiving the amount, the defacto complainant requested time for three months to deliver the vacant possession and the petitioner has also agreed for the same. Thereafter, the defacto complainant made an endorsement in the cancelled lease deed that he has received the entire lease amount from the petitioner and he undertake to deliver the vacant possession on or before 05.03.2016. It is further submitted that failing to hand over the possession, on 03.03.2016, defacto complainant filed a false suit in O.S.No.1218 of 2016 before the City Civil Court, Chennai against the petitioner and obtained interim injunction by suppressing all these facts. After obtaining interim injunction, the defacto complainant lodged a false complaint against the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
