Dismissed

Murugan @ Murugavel v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC27 Jun 2016CRL OP/13089/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants the bail petition signed by the petitioner but dismissed in paragraph 5. The petitioner claimed innocence and alleged false implication. The Government Advocate opposed bail citing prior cases and witness tampering risks. The court dismissed the petition due to serious allegations and prior cases.

What did the court decide?

None; Bail petition dismissed.

Murugan @ Murugavel Vs the Inspector of Police — Corruption | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.13089 of 2016

¶3

S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.

¶4

The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.05.2016 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 336, 427, 397 and 506(2) IPC in Crime No.981 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail

¶5

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is alleged to have robbed a sum of Rs.1,200/- from the defacto complainant at knife point.

¶6

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case.

¶7

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) has opposed to grant bail to the petitioner stating that the petitioner has involved in two previous cases and that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will tamper the witnesses.

¶8

Since serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and he is involved in two previous cases, this court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner and the petition is dismissed.

27.06.2016

kal

S.VAIDYANATHAN, J

¶13

kal

¶14

Crl.O.P.No.13089 of 2016

¶15

27.06.2016

¶16

¶17

nd that if the petitioner is released on bail, she will tamper the witnesses.

¶18

Since serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and she has involved four previous cases, this court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner and the petition is dismissed.

¶19

nd that if the petitioner is released on bail, she will tamper the witnesses.

¶20

Since serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and she has involved four previous cases, this court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner and the petition is dismissed.

¶21

nd that if the petitioner is released on bail, she will tamper the witnesses.

¶22

Since serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and she has involved four previous cases, this court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner and the petition is dismissed.

Murugan @ Murugavel v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugan @ Murugavel v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Sridhar Vs the State Rep.by

S.Narayanamoorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Ravichandran Vs the State Rep by

Mr. Amararam, Vs State Rep. by the Inspector

T.Mathyalagan Vs the Inspector of Police

M.K.Ravithilakh Vs State Rep.by